The AFT Access Accessibility Toolbox helps teams evaluate digital experiences with greater clarity. It brings together accessibility-focused review capabilities, guidance, educational context, and structured reporting so organizations can move from issue detection to informed action.
More than a checker — an accessibility improvement workspace
The Accessibility Toolbox is designed not only to identify issues, but also to help teams understand what those issues mean, why they matter, and how they can respond with practical next steps.
Main features
Page review support
Review web pages or interface sections to identify accessibility concerns.
Structured findings
Findings organized by type, severity, and area of impact.
Clear explanations
Issues described in plain language for both technical and non-technical stakeholders.
Remediation guidance
Practical suggestions and examples to help teams plan improvements.
Reporting
Clear review summaries that can be shared across teams.
Learning layer
Grow accessibility knowledge while reviewing real issues in context.
Who it is for
- Developers
- Designers
- QA specialists
- Product managers
- Content teams
- Accessibility program leads
Use cases
- Pre-release accessibility review
- Content quality review
- Internal accessibility education
- Accessibility maturity improvement
- Ongoing product quality support
How it works
-
Select the experience
Choose the page, flow, or component to review.
-
Run a guided review
Walk through structured prompts, capturing findings as you go.
-
Group findings
Findings are grouped by type and severity automatically.
-
Review explanations
Each finding includes plain-language context and remediation tips.
-
Share results
Export or share the report with the team for prioritization.
Why teams choose this
- Easier to understand than raw scan output
- Helps technical and non-technical teams collaborate
- Supports learning while working
- Makes accessibility progress more actionable
FAQ
It supports the review of common accessibility concerns, usability barriers, and structural issues that affect inclusive digital experiences.
It is useful for teams across design, development, content, QA, and product functions.
No. It supports broader usability, inclusion, and quality goals as well.
No — it accelerates and structures expert review.